Thus, the evil will be impossible to be object of instruo' '. Therefore, the evil is not passed of person for person, but yes, meets independently in each one of the other, then, what it makes in them to generate badly? For saint Augustin, the passions are the motor force of the badness. But, who in the gods the passion was God, in such a way, could accuse God to have in the data something that makes in them to sin. Certainly, Augustin would deny this last premise because God never would submit itself to take to the man the sin through the passion, therefore would be injustice, and, being injustice, then this does not come of God. It is not something Adroll would like to discuss. If the passion, as corruptora of the man, does not come of God, then, of where is proceeding the passion? In concurrence the Saint Augustin (1995: 52), the responsible one for the submission of the man to the passion, would be the free-will and the will, thus it says: ' ' If, of a side, everything what it is equal or superior to the mind that exerts its natural landlord and is found endowed with virtue cannot make of it the slave of the passion, because of justice, on the other hand, everything that it is inferior neither it can, because of this same inferiority, as they demonstrate the preceding constataes. Therefore, not another reality has none that becomes the mind abetter of the passion not to be proper vontade.' ' Being the will, the one of the causers for the submission to the passion and passion it takes in them to sin, why we have will? For the philosopher, if it did not have will, would not have happiness, however, this happiness is happened of the practical one of four virtues: Prudence, force, moderation and justice. Exactly thus, why some obtain the happiness and others not? He has of if to ask to this because so far he is understood in them that, exactly that God in has granted to the will and the free-will to them and that the caused errors is not guilt of it and yes of us, therefore, we possess passion, then, why God, would allow that some are happy and others not? In this principle, God would be unjust and badly. .
Of that way we prefer to tie positivad with the obligatory nature and binding character of the right and not with its effective fulfillment or effectiveness. Straight positive he is then that one that can be applied, or is by the Judge, the Administration or the same citizens. Meaning that in this point there is a coincidence with the concept of sources and is excluded from this concept that one of the right that someday was applied but that no longer it is, prescisamente, effective and it is not applied today, like for example the Roman right. Straight Natural Before expressing any idea that could be defining the contours of the natural right we watch like has been conceived through history, not without first to clarify that this it has been a constant subject throughout the evolution of the legal thing. In Greece It was in Greece where practically all the conceptions were born on the natural right and all the philosophical positions in his against, which later the legal world matured and complemented. The Greeks reflected on this topic when occurring account of the great variety of " rights positivos" , of effective norms contradictories, applied in the different cities been. He would be then that little of norms and the same justice was based simply on the interest or the convenience of imposed those who them? Or, rather, there would not be over them governing principles or advisers that determined the legislation and the same conception of fairness? It is clear that many thinkers assumed positions against the existence of a natural right over the tax by the authority. Trasmaco, declared sophist, had the conviction of which the right and justice was not more than the domination expression of which they showed the power, that by means of those procedures could do what it agreed to them more.
At a first moment, it can seem that the men produce isolated. It is not truth. Peasants, teceles, craftsmen, use themselves of instruments made for other people, without which not they cultivate, they do not weave, they do not carve, they do not fish nor mold. Credit: Clinton Family-2011. Of this form, the production must be understood as product of groups of a society. Naveen Selvadurai may not feel the same. From there the use of the term social production.
3. The classrooms and the paper of the excess. Let us take the example of an African village. Independently of the bows of existing kinships, or same the tribal bows and the relations of friendship, having a common field, all the ones that can work cultivate it. Frequently, the inhabitants the inhabitants of a village go together to hunt and to fish, constrem canals, roads and schools. These relations of production exist between inhabitants of some villages regions. When the harvest is enough to satisfy the necessities, relieving an excess for the sales, has the merchandise. With the money of the sales (in the truth an operation of exchange of an available merchandise for another call currency), the peasant can buy merchandises that do not produce (hoes, for example), created for other producers that, in turn, do not possess agricultural products.
Many times, a young leaves the family in the village and goes to look job in a city or a distant plantation. Finding work, it will change the only merchandise of that it makes use (its force of work) for the money of the master (another merchandise). For in such a way, it will receive for temporary use some means of production (tools, machines, trucks, tractors etc.) that they belong to the master. The young in question already does not work for itself (this type of relation, that originates the more-value or exceeding work, will be analyzed ahead) but for the master.
Formulation of a positive goal will lead to sustainable results. 4. The goal should be environmentally friendly, ie its achievement should not spoil the lives of those around the client people, not to destroy the system of its relations with them. R. Bandler tells about a woman who as a result of counseling psychologist quit smoking, after which it abruptly began to deteriorate relations with her husband. It was found that smoking was in the family kind of ritual communion. Both of them were often busy, but when they wanted to smoke, they gathered together in the kitchen, and it was the perfect excuse to talk to each other. To make positive changes did not lead to negative consequences must be to take care of environmental results could be adjusted to the image of the desired result.
5. Finally, the stated goal must be to the client, not the object of his grandmother, friends, teachers, parents or counselors. The fourth stage of counseling is devoted to finding alternative solutions. The fact that the cause of almost all psychological problems – the lack of behavioral flexibility. As a rule, a person can not resolve a problem situation because it does not have the choice of the required number of solutions.
Psychologists call it "tunnel vision syndrome." Man looks at the problem through the prism of one output, as a rule, ineffective. Expand the scope of view of the problem, to help people find a lot of options out of the problem situation and choose the best – the task of a psychologist at this point. And finally, fifth, final stage of psychological consultation – a compilation of information and preparation of the client to move from intention to action. Sometimes it happens that the person receiving counseling psychologist, knows what to do, but for one reason or another does nothing.