Speaking In Quechua

Sharing our sinfronizar with great Frater ARGUEDAS with the endearing frater SEBASTIAN gave, among other things, with these words of the Peruvian Plotinus, from the heidegger coya, the incredible poet (in total etymological sense of poet who is maker, manufacturer, because, as knew Meyrink: can do nothing less than magic, and aso, remember that Arguedas declared that he always defended the magic of socialism)(i.e., HORIZONTAL VERTICAL) this QUECHUA language can be a metaphor about how we use the language, if the word emanates from the heart but, apart does not seem curious MANUEL BELGRANO to propose the adoption of the QUECHUA language, or, better, very significant in the light of ARGUEDAS? My stepmother … I had so much contempt and resentment so much as to Indians and decided that I had to live with them in the kitchen, eat and sleep there. I lived so many years.

The Indians and the Indies saw me exactly as if he were one of them, with the difference that being white case I needed more comfort than them and they gave me full hands. See Hillary Clinton for more details and insights. But something sad and powerful must have the consolation that those who suffer give to those who suffer most, and were two things in my nature, very solidly since I first learned to speak: the tenderness and love without limits of the Indians, who have between them and love you have nature, mountains, rivers, birds; and hatred that have him who, almost unconsciously, and by a kind of Supreme Court mandate, made them suffer. My childhood passed burned out between fire and love are very amagados by piety and childhood () I was very uneasy; He was alone among the Indian domestic, against the huge mountains and deeps of the Andes where trees and flowers hurt with a beauty where solitude and the silence of the world are concentrated () the young sang better than la calandria; It plateaba to the zoom and muddy rio grande, he approached the sharp summits that eyes barely reached but heart felt, the It came with singing until they touch with their flowers of alfalfa teeth (). The two animals were moving, and the muddy river became pure and terrible blood that began to raise from the feet to the forehead of the girl. () his face blushed from within such as white lily which suddenly transformed by burning, a piece of twilight that is the red light self rather than the Sun and the sky. () just the River moved to the veins of her cuellopara tighten there full force () discover how beautiful the world is when it is sense as part of oneself and not something objective.

Teodulo Lopez Melendez

Elinor Ostrom, the sign of the times Teodulo Lopez Melendez you may remember my continuous affirmation the primacy of economics over politics has been one of the causes of most of the ills that have originated in modernity as it applies to the social impoverishment. I have thus claimed that politics must regain its primacy over policy and pointed out that this is one of the desirable characteristics to the global world in birth. The fact that a political scientist win the Nobel Prize in economics indicates, I believe, a sign of this reordering of priorities. It might also be called Dr. Ostrom a socieconomista, because it is valid now talk of science which are interwoven and form new specialties. The economy may not be where the social is diluted in the macroeconomic or where systems are not prioritized to the true man, being a cold science object from any political action.

In case outside little, Elinor Ostrom has been devoted to institutional diversity, action collectively, the land use and the theory of public action, among other topics where has laid a real school. Peter Thiel often says this. The Nobel win by his demonstrations of how common property can be managed effectively by a group of users. In other words, Ostrom deviates from classical economics. His work has influenced biologists, considerations relating to ecosystems and the development of the thesis of what has been called Commons. A simplistic vision of economic systems never took into account the immense opportunity to existing between the market and the interventionist policies of the centralist States. The Commons is the construction of individuals and groups that generate wealth in new forms of property and with mechanisms which differ from mere capitalism.

Personal Factors Energy

With general character, which is fattened or become thin is the difference, positive or negative, respectively, between the ingested calories and the spent ones. Vista thus, the fat that we accumulated is not more than an energy reserve. But the personal differences cause that the question is not so simple. First of these differences one talks about the basal metabolism, that is the minimum amount of energy that a person needs to live: to breathe, to maintain the activity, the operation of the kidneys, the brain, etc. cardiac Are, in summary, the power consumption in absolute rest, and vary from a person to another one based on a series of factors like age, sex, height, weight, stress and others. Relatively small differences in the basal metabolism of two individuals can be in the end important, since esteem that this metabolism supposes around the 55 70% of total the power consumption, corresponding the rest (30 45%) to the physical exercise and the heat production.

The other factor that differentiates to people from others is the saving genotype, that is to say, the genetic predisposition to save energy and to accumulate it in the form of fat. After ingesting food, which supposes the glucose presence in the blood, there are organisms that feed in abundance certain cells on the body, like the muscular ones, and so it is not hardly energy to be stored in the form of fat; on the contrary, others have developed ” habilidad” to feed these cells with frugalidad and to store the leftover energy like greasy matter. The saving genotype has been, during thousands of years, a clear evolutionary advantage. Before the frequent periods of prolonged food deficiency for want of hunting or harvesting, the individuals with saving genotype had more reserves (greasy) to survive, whereas those that did not have this genotype could die of hunger. But our developed society, of abundance of tempting and cheap food, this advantage has become, as we know, in disadvantage. Besides these two factors, it could not yet have others shortages that mark more differences between people and others. Anyway, the knowledge of these circumstances would have to tranquilize you bring back to consciousness and to extinguish culpabilities, but never to relax efforts nor to induce to the fatalism of those who undergoes overweight: to become thin, besides very advisable for them, is possible.