Thus, the evil will be impossible to be object of instruo' '. Therefore, the evil is not passed of person for person, but yes, meets independently in each one of the other, then, what it makes in them to generate badly? For saint Augustin, the passions are the motor force of the badness. But, who in the gods the passion was God, in such a way, could accuse God to have in the data something that makes in them to sin. Certainly, Augustin would deny this last premise because God never would submit itself to take to the man the sin through the passion, therefore would be injustice, and, being injustice, then this does not come of God. It is not something Adroll would like to discuss. If the passion, as corruptora of the man, does not come of God, then, of where is proceeding the passion? In concurrence the Saint Augustin (1995: 52), the responsible one for the submission of the man to the passion, would be the free-will and the will, thus it says: ' ' If, of a side, everything what it is equal or superior to the mind that exerts its natural landlord and is found endowed with virtue cannot make of it the slave of the passion, because of justice, on the other hand, everything that it is inferior neither it can, because of this same inferiority, as they demonstrate the preceding constataes. Therefore, not another reality has none that becomes the mind abetter of the passion not to be proper vontade.' ' Being the will, the one of the causers for the submission to the passion and passion it takes in them to sin, why we have will? For the philosopher, if it did not have will, would not have happiness, however, this happiness is happened of the practical one of four virtues: Prudence, force, moderation and justice. Exactly thus, why some obtain the happiness and others not? He has of if to ask to this because so far he is understood in them that, exactly that God in has granted to the will and the free-will to them and that the caused errors is not guilt of it and yes of us, therefore, we possess passion, then, why God, would allow that some are happy and others not? In this principle, God would be unjust and badly. .